Unofficial Message Board Home of Steve Wood
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
gotta give it to you, hellobozo,you keep on a truckin! I'm not very good at following the flow sometimes.are you saying that you are now happy with your results with the fast xfi 2.0 and cals tune?
Yes, for my combonation, Aftermarket ECU with pro Tune runs better -vs- Stock ECU/Translator Plus/Extender custom made chip/an a supposed Pro Tune of it all worth only 1/8 mile WOT time.
Quote from: Hellobozos on January 12 2013, 08:17:17 PMYes, for my combonation, Aftermarket ECU with pro Tune runs better -vs- Stock ECU/Translator Plus/Extender custom made chip/an a supposed Pro Tune of it all worth only 1/8 mile WOT time. Seriously (Not taking a jab like every body else) how do you explain the ALL them eleven second and faster cars on stock ECMs? ?My car is a BS car but still goes 114 in the 1/4 and friend of mines goes 10.80s in the 1/4 also with a stock ECM and chip. And his car/build is over 6 years old and doesn't miss a beat.
2011 Midwest Buick Challenge TSM finalsWalt has been 9.30's on a stock ecm and normally runs 9.50s in TSM on a stock ecm. He has not sued anyone.There are way more cars running in the tens on stock ecms than there are running any aftermarket fuel management system.Most would agree that it is easier to run a RACE car in the Nines on an aftermarket system because of the flexibility of tuning as well as the speed of the computer.
Walt tunes his. Most us tune our own...it is not exactly rocket science tho it does take some common sense....