IHADAV8.com - Turbo Buick Tech, and Nonsense
Yet Another Buick Board
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Welcome to IHADAV8.com!
Home
Help
Search
Calendar
Login
Register
IHADAV8.com - Turbo Buick Tech, and Nonsense
»
Tech Area
»
General Buick Tech
»
Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Down
Author
Topic: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo (Read 7618 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Scoobum
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 5599
PSI: 3
RED-RETIRED EXTREMELY DANGEROUS
Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
on:
August 02 2011, 08:24:01 AM »
Curiosity has finally gotten the better of me. I sold off a set of Centerlines collecting dust and some Buick junk...and put together enuf cash to order a 6262 journal bearing billet turbo with the S housing and .63 exhaust housing. Precision claims a 3000 convertor is a perfect match (AC 16930 NL 3000 in my car)...so let's see how it compares to the 70 P trim with the .63 Garrett exhaust housing I currently have on the car. I'm gonna order Erics new 5.7 chip. If I've read correctly...hi
s 5.7 alky chip brings the 1-2 timing in faster. I'm hoping the turbo shows up late next week...as I'm up here in Canada...so shipping takes a little longer. Let's see if these billet turbos live up to the hype.
Logged
Hard work pays off, dreams come true. Bad times don't last, but BAD GUYS do!
RIP Scott Hall AKA Razor Ramon
Steve Wood
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 9950
PSI: 34
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #1 on:
August 02 2011, 08:50:21 AM »
they do spool with less converter.
Logged
Steve Wood
http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com
A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.
ttipe
VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY NUT CASE
Bone Stock
Posts: 86
PSI: 0
Boost n00b
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #2 on:
August 08 2011, 10:11:18 PM »
I rate the spool of a turbo by the distance travelled from a dead wholeshot until the boost gage breaks 0 psi.My Ta61 with the same 16930 n/l converter breaks 0 psi boost in roughly 12 feet.I have an RJC graiger valve which is cranked all the way down.I also have a stock cam and my compression is at 8.55:1.Just a point of reference.
Logged
4" CAI, severely modded TA61, PTE slic with modded scoop,Weber shrtblock (in process modded Hemco), ported intake, ported GN1's, 212,206,111 cam, T & D 1.6 ratio,8.51 to 1,TA headers,60 lb's , XFI, 8an fuel feed, 6an return, 340L, 9.5 PTC 3200, Janis 2004R, boxed upr & lwrs, HR sway bar 275/ 60r/15s
Steve Wood
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 9950
PSI: 34
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #3 on:
August 09 2011, 09:29:33 AM »
With regard to spool up, I consider it to be the time it takes the turbo to reach full boost after I launch the car. Not all turbos are linear in spool. Some, will take longer to make the first 10 psi than they do the next 15. Others will have an almost linear acceleration ramp. It is a bit difficult to define what is ideal as it will depend upon the power level being generated and the ability of the tires to transfer it to the ground. In the end, whatever is meaningful on the car works
Logged
Steve Wood
http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com
A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.
Scoobum
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 5599
PSI: 3
RED-RETIRED EXTREMELY DANGEROUS
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #4 on:
August 19 2011, 09:34:45 PM »
New turbo is here...so I'm gonna bolt it on here at the house in the morning...and then drive it to the shop to port the wastegate hole. The half hour drive to the shop will give Erics new 5.7 chip a chance to learn. I'm gonna flog it at an abandoned airport strip next weekend to log some runs on PL and make some 02 adjustments.
Logged
Hard work pays off, dreams come true. Bad times don't last, but BAD GUYS do!
RIP Scott Hall AKA Razor Ramon
Steve Wood
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 9950
PSI: 34
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #5 on:
August 19 2011, 10:43:44 PM »
good!
Logged
Steve Wood
http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com
A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.
Just a Six?
OK Now who Farted??
Turbo Street Eliminator
Posts: 1253
PSI: 2
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #6 on:
August 20 2011, 12:35:04 PM »
Is there an event at the airport strip or can you just drive in & beat the snot out of the car? That sounds like fun!
Logged
David
87 LTD. Purchased May 88
Doeskin leather, coach lites without Landau Roof, moon roof, carpeted trunk & No Factory Hood Ornament!
The sticker on AC shows a V-8 Carb car. Special order by Mr. Nick Hall VP of GM Canada
Runs 11.50 on 21 lbs with my old style 67 Q Trim & Alchy
Top Speed
Don't Tread on Me
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 2548
PSI: -2
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #7 on:
August 20 2011, 12:35:18 PM »
Let us know how it works!
Logged
Champion Irons w/T&D roller rockers, TA-61 turbo, 206/206 Comp Cam, 57 lb/hr Siemens Injectors, 3000 stall PTC, PTE Plenum w/RJC Power Plate, 70 mm Accufab Throttle Body, RJC 325 Megacooler, TurboTweak 5.7/ Alky Control w/M1 methanol, 23 psig on the street, Puddn' Power engine, Borla Exhaust
Chris
Scoobum
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 5599
PSI: 3
RED-RETIRED EXTREMELY DANGEROUS
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #8 on:
August 20 2011, 12:55:49 PM »
I will Chris...timesl
ips and PL logs. I've read some wild claims about this turbo...now let's see what it does in the real world. I'm skeptical.
Logged
Hard work pays off, dreams come true. Bad times don't last, but BAD GUYS do!
RIP Scott Hall AKA Razor Ramon
Steve Wood
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 9950
PSI: 34
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #9 on:
August 20 2011, 01:47:15 PM »
it is a good turbo...but, I doubt it will live up to the hype....gotta hype stuff to get people to replace what they already have. Magic always sells
Logged
Steve Wood
http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com
A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.
Scoobum
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 5599
PSI: 3
RED-RETIRED EXTREMELY DANGEROUS
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #10 on:
August 20 2011, 05:39:41 PM »
All bolted down...with zero exhaust leaks. Let it sit in the driveway and idle for awhile to allow for Erics chip to learn. A quick shower...and then off to the shop to port the wastegate hole. I`ll say one thing for Eric...he`s accurate. Fans kicked on at exactly 168 via the SM.
Logged
Hard work pays off, dreams come true. Bad times don't last, but BAD GUYS do!
RIP Scott Hall AKA Razor Ramon
Scoobum
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 5599
PSI: 3
RED-RETIRED EXTREMELY DANGEROUS
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #11 on:
August 21 2011, 10:44:35 AM »
First impressions of the 6262. This thing spools fast...real fast. I'd say Precision is spot on recommending a 3000 convertor. Engaged the line lock...warmed up the back tires...put it against the footbrake...an
d got 10 PSI of boost in just under 3 seconds. I got out to the shop last nite...but there was rain moving in...so I couldn't get the porting done. I turned around and headed for home. I leaned into it and brought the boost up to 12 PSI and it pulled clean and hard with no KR. I'm off Friday, so I'll get the porting done then. Saturday I'm off to the airport to get the boost dialed in...max I'm gonna run is 22. I had Eric set the 02's for 22 PSI...so I'll get an ET with the default setting and one with the WOT 02's pulled down to 770-780. I'll post the results.
Logged
Hard work pays off, dreams come true. Bad times don't last, but BAD GUYS do!
RIP Scott Hall AKA Razor Ramon
Steve Wood
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 9950
PSI: 34
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #12 on:
August 21 2011, 11:22:01 AM »
Have fun!!!
Logged
Steve Wood
http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com
A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.
Scoobum
Turbo Street Outlaw
Posts: 5599
PSI: 3
RED-RETIRED EXTREMELY DANGEROUS
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #13 on:
August 21 2011, 08:18:31 PM »
Don't worry...we will. Got a friend with a supercharged F 150 going out with me.
Logged
Hard work pays off, dreams come true. Bad times don't last, but BAD GUYS do!
RIP Scott Hall AKA Razor Ramon
ttipe
VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY NUT CASE
Bone Stock
Posts: 86
PSI: 0
Boost n00b
Re: Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
«
Reply #14 on:
August 21 2011, 11:01:36 PM »
I would be interested in seeing a universal set of criteria to rate some of these new turbos,ie; the use of the compressor map for numerical analysis but also some standardized tests for confirmation.S
ome folks are not sold on the new wheel design and machining capability vs the old wheels and the correct tweeks and or synergy of parts.The new wheels just by virtue of the math,materials and processes involved are superior to the old cast wheels,but by how much.Does the benefit of the superior new wheel actually benefit every situation? This is a situation which is specific to the car and the usage involved.Patri
ck wanted to see a 6262 in my car (I have a 3000 n/l Ac 16930) yet I don't have a forged bottom end to take advantage of the "new" capability.My synergy of parts will spool what I currently have just as quick (if not faster so I am told) as the the new wheel.The work inside the turbine hsg got me another 45cfm above the 900cfm rating (about 30 hp=6152e) but with a robust spool.Sorry to babble on.There are other things yet to be done in my own case.Just food for thought perhaps.
Logged
4" CAI, severely modded TA61, PTE slic with modded scoop,Weber shrtblock (in process modded Hemco), ported intake, ported GN1's, 212,206,111 cam, T & D 1.6 ratio,8.51 to 1,TA headers,60 lb's , XFI, 8an fuel feed, 6an return, 340L, 9.5 PTC 3200, Janis 2004R, boxed upr & lwrs, HR sway bar 275/ 60r/15s
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Up
« previous
next »
IHADAV8.com - Turbo Buick Tech, and Nonsense
»
Tech Area
»
General Buick Tech
»
Old School Turbo vs New School Turbo
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal