Zap *STILL* wears Depends
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'm also surprised at just how rarely people mention that head flow really means dick on a turbo engine. Granted, anything you do to decrease restriction is a net positive... but there's no need to spend $1000s when a simple 1/2 turn will do the same thing. (until the combo is maxxxed out)
I did mention to a few people what he was working on and I got responds of, "That can't work! That defies the science behind it."
That just means you didn't consider ALL the science.
One thing I have noticed about the engineering types. When they find something that works for them, they'd rather get hit in the head with a hammer than change the way they do things.
Quote from: earlbrown on November 17 2013, 02:19:41 PMI'm also surprised at just how rarely people mention that head flow really means dick on a turbo engine. Granted, anything you do to decrease restriction is a net positive... but there's no need to spend $1000s when a simple 1/2 turn will do the same thing. (until the combo is maxxxed out)True dat! Be advised that turning up the wick may increase air volume but probably reduces mass density (how tightly packed the air molecules are per unit of volume) since the air friction goes up so air temperature goes up. It's not just the amount of air you pump into the chamber but it's how easy you pump it in (larger unshrouded valves) and the efficiency of the burn process (chamber shape and position of spark plug within the chamber) and how much you reduce the tendency to knock (spark plug location within the cylinder & relational position to the valves).
This popped up today:http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=744