« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs  (Read 3741 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Steve Wood

  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 9950
  • PSI: 34
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com/
Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs
« on: September 24 2012, 10:28:45 AM »
Anyone ever compare the ride height between the two?  Also how is the handling affected between the two?

Thinking about replacing the Eibachs on the rear of my GN to get a little more clearance above the 28" tire when I have a passenger while going down a bumpy road
Logged
Steve Wood

http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com

A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.

Offline Steve Wood

  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 9950
  • PSI: 34
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com/
Re: Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs
« Reply #1 on: September 24 2012, 11:55:45 AM »
never mind, I think I will use the standard spring
Logged
Steve Wood

http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com

A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.

Offline Scott87

  • Bone Stock
  • **
  • Posts: 92
  • PSI: 0
  • Boost Tube
    • View Profile
Re: Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs
« Reply #2 on: September 24 2012, 12:09:56 PM »
What was the finding that persuaded your decision?

Posted From Tapatalk
Logged

Offline Steve Wood

  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 9950
  • PSI: 34
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com/
Re: Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs
« Reply #3 on: September 24 2012, 12:11:44 PM »
better launches according to some
Logged
Steve Wood

http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com

A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.

Offline Steve Wood

  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 9950
  • PSI: 34
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com/
Re: Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs
« Reply #4 on: September 24 2012, 12:12:53 PM »
still trying to figure out which is the best part number for the moog, tho :D  Do not want lower than stock ride height

so far it looks like the 5379
Logged
Steve Wood

http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com

A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.

Offline daveismissing

  • Two Buicks- too little money$$
  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 6517
  • PSI: 3
  • Two Buicks- too little money$$
    • View Profile
Re: Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs
« Reply #5 on: September 24 2012, 10:08:11 PM »
Where is this database of spring specs that you guys peruse?
Logged
-Drain plug by Earl Brown, custom oil pan by Rich's Auto

Offline Steve Wood

  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 9950
  • PSI: 34
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com/
Re: Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs
« Reply #6 on: September 24 2012, 10:51:13 PM »
Peruse, abuse, whatever

Here is one....   http://jeffd.50megs.com/Moog_Spring_Page.htm
I think there is similar on the monte site and gbody sites...

Or you can dumb it down on rock auto
Logged
Steve Wood

http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com

A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.

Offline TRICKSIXPA

  • Bone Stock
  • **
  • Posts: 73
  • PSI: 0
  • Shiny Parts Addict!
    • View Profile
Re: Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs
« Reply #7 on: September 27 2012, 05:06:19 PM »
I took my Eibachs off after I redid the rear suspension my 28s where sitting awful close went with the Moog Cargo coils variable weight. As long as there is a good bar on the back car will be fine. I stayed Variable weight since the Eibachs were a variable weight spring too. just wanted to pick the car up a couple of inches. Took the Eibach off the front when I redid the front supension too.
Logged
I don't care What Congress does as long as they don't do it on the streets and scare the kids!!

Offline Steve Wood

  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 9950
  • PSI: 34
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com/
Re: Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs
« Reply #8 on: September 27 2012, 05:57:40 PM »
Yeah, the Eibachs are variable and they seemed to work fine.   If one is trying to be technical, most shocks are valved for a linear spring rate and the variable springs also tend to unload the suspension more abruptly than does a linear wound spring after launch.

In the back of my head, I keep thinking the springs on the other car are variable rate but I might be wrong.  It has no problem with the tires even with someone in the back seat.  At any rate, spring or not, I sent $42 for a pair of standard replacements to the Rock.

Eibachs still on the front at this point.  For sure they resist weight transfer
Logged
Steve Wood

http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com

A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.

Offline motorhead

  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 2267
  • PSI: 4
  • look at my balls... look at them!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs
« Reply #9 on: September 27 2012, 08:18:05 PM »
I use standard springs from a Celebrity wagon... I've seen springs from a Fox body Mustang used as well.
Logged
>>>Das Instagram<<<
'80 LeMans Wagon|'87 Monte Carlo SS|'92 Camaro Z28|'07 TrailBlazer SS|'15 Colorado Z71|'19 Hellcat Widebooty M6

Offline Steve Wood

  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 9950
  • PSI: 34
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com/
Re: Standard Rear vs Variable Rate cargo rear springs
« Reply #10 on: September 28 2012, 10:56:39 AM »
Was wrong...other car has linear springs on it...got the replacements in this morning
Logged
Steve Wood

http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com

A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal