Author Topic: cam comparison  (Read 7688 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TurboCajun

  • Keith Theriot
  • Turbo Street Modified
  • *****
  • Posts: 324
  • PSI: 1
  • 6 Packed
    • View Profile
Re: cam comparison
« Reply #15 on: May 07 2012, 05:10:48 PM »
TA stuff  208/208, their lifters and replacement timing chain, ? my springs should be OK for this cam right
85 GN -- Converted to 87 set-up using 66/72 turbo, front mount I/C, 80lb injectors,gn1 heads 14 bolt 1.65 roller rockers stud mount, ported intake with plate, fuel hot wire, 3" dp, running 24psi., alky kit, stroker 20 over, 212/206 roller,  best time 10.995 @ 121 1.56 60ft

Offline Steve Wood

  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 9950
  • PSI: 34
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com/
Re: cam comparison
« Reply #16 on: May 07 2012, 05:50:39 PM »
don't know what springs you have so we cannot really answer that....If they are single springs, or single with a damper, they are probably okay.  If they are dual springs, then I would not use them.

Single chain, not a dual roller.  New tensioner and button, I would say
Steve Wood

http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com

A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.

Offline TurboCajun

  • Keith Theriot
  • Turbo Street Modified
  • *****
  • Posts: 324
  • PSI: 1
  • 6 Packed
    • View Profile
Re: cam comparison
« Reply #17 on: May 07 2012, 06:31:50 PM »
ok thanks
85 GN -- Converted to 87 set-up using 66/72 turbo, front mount I/C, 80lb injectors,gn1 heads 14 bolt 1.65 roller rockers stud mount, ported intake with plate, fuel hot wire, 3" dp, running 24psi., alky kit, stroker 20 over, 212/206 roller,  best time 10.995 @ 121 1.56 60ft

Offline gbsean

  • Turbo Street Modified
  • *****
  • Posts: 643
  • PSI: 1
    • View Profile
    • http://www.buickperfomancegroup.com
Re: cam comparison
« Reply #18 on: May 07 2012, 08:18:48 PM »
if you are going to continue to throw parts at your problem pick a vendor that is used to building motors or supplies those that do...

http://www.fullthrottlespeed.com/itemdesc.asp+ic+001BU208CAM+eq++Tp+

http://www.taperformance.com/products.asp?cat=158

Brian at gbody is a nice guy but knows squat about building a motor..

Offline SuperSix

  • Administrator
  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 5072
  • PSI: 234
    • View Profile
Re: cam comparison
« Reply #19 on: May 07 2012, 11:19:53 PM »
if you are going to continue to throw parts at your problem pick a vendor that is used to building motors or supplies those that do...

http://www.fullthrottlespeed.com/itemdesc.asp+ic+001BU208CAM+eq++Tp+

http://www.taperformance.com/products.asp?cat=158

Brian at gbody is a nice guy but knows squat about building a motor..

This was my train of thought - minus the "nice guy" part.
'87 GN, 60lb, TA49, THDP, FTP cam, T+ lots o' shit - SOLD
'07 Ford F150 Lariat 2WD, 5.4L 3v - 255k
'20 Kubota BX2380. FEL, 60" deck
'78 IH/Case 184 Lo-Boy
'99 Kawasaki Bayou 400 4x4

Offline Steve Wood

  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 9950
  • PSI: 34
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com/
Re: cam comparison
« Reply #20 on: May 07 2012, 11:34:21 PM »
A number of years ago,  those companies that made lifters in this country, stopped.  Johnson was considered to be the best built lifter by many when it came to durability and quietness.

That is when we started seeing all the failures on mild cam installs.  Damn imported lifters were so soft on the bottom that it made failure easy on new cam installs...giv en the mislocated lifter bore on 3E, it is particularly easy to F one up on a Buick.  It is not a question of zinc in the oil during the install or later...it is simply a case of sorry lifters.

Last year, I read that Johnson had started making them again.  I think one other company may have as well altho the name slips my mind.

I suggested TA purely because they are advertising Johnson lifters with hardened bases.  I don't know whom else may be selling an American made lifter, but, TA advertises the supplier.  I would gladly pay three times the price for a decent lifter rather than take the chance that I would soon be doing it again... :)
Steve Wood

http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com

A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.

Offline Charlief1

  • Just another kinky six
  • Turbo Street Eliminator
  • ******
  • Posts: 1348
  • PSI: 2
    • View Profile
Re: cam comparison
« Reply #21 on: May 07 2012, 11:39:15 PM »
I remember someone posting that AZ is still selling the flat tappet lifters with the hardened base on it so you can still get them but you've got to look for them. :(
And remember, when dealing with children, silence may be golden but duct tape is silver.

Offline daveismissing

  • Two Buicks- too little money$$
  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 6517
  • PSI: 3
  • Two Buicks- too little money$$
    • View Profile
Re: cam comparison
« Reply #22 on: May 07 2012, 11:55:50 PM »
-Drain plug by Earl Brown, custom oil pan by Rich's Auto

Offline Steve Wood

  • Turbo Street Outlaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 9950
  • PSI: 34
    • View Profile
    • http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com/
Re: cam comparison
« Reply #23 on: May 08 2012, 09:54:49 AM »
I wouldn't
Steve Wood

http://www.vortexbuicks-etc.com

A lot of broken parts does not make you a racer; it makes you a slow learner.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal